A Broader Volume Range for Eppendorf Tubes


With the introduction of the two screw cap tubes 15 mL and 50 mL, Eppendorf Tubes® now cover the entire volume range from 0.5 mL to 50 mL.

Video: Randox Toxicology

-Sponsored- Randox Toxicology innovative Biochip Array Technology offers multiplex, multi matrice testing which has created a number of advancements in the Forensic Toxicology Field. With our unique tests for New Psychoactive Substances Randox Toxicology have became the market leader due to our pioneering research and development programme.

Video: UC Davis Forensics Program & the M-Vac System

-Sponsored- Chris Hopkins, Director of the UC Davis Forensic Science Graduate program and 25-year FBI agent, discusses the value of the M-Vac in collecting DNA evidence.

Elder Abuse Forensic Centers Show Promise

Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of the Elder Abuse Forensic Center Model, the result of an NIJ-funded project, is available to review online.

Dyes at the Molecular Level Help ID Fibers

Through the National Criminal Justice Reference Service, NIJ has made available the following final technical report (this report is the result of an NIJ-funded project but was not published by the U.S. Department of Justice): Validation of Forensic Characterization and Chemical Identification of Dyes Extracted from Millimeter-length Fibers (pdf, 142 pages)

Update on the National Commission on Forensic Science

The Department of Justice established the National Commission on Forensic Science in partnership with the National Institute of Standards and Technology to enhance the practice and improve the reliability of forensic science. Learn about the Commission in this online presentation by John Butler from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Results 161 - 176 of 357

Forensic Podiatry (Part Two of Two)

THE DISCIPLINE of forensic podiatry—or, in other words, the examination of pedal evidence—has progressed significantly over the past ten years. It is no longer a question of “What can you do with a footprint?” but rather, “Who can we use to evaluate the footprint?” Cases involving pedal evidence, especially bloody footprints and issues of determining shoe sizing or fit issues compared to questioned footwear, have become more common over the past two or three years.