New Turbo Forensic Light System

The CAO Group (CAO), a world-leading high-technology company, continues to lead innovation in the forensic light industry with the launch of the new UltraLite™ ALS Turbo heads, which results in twice the amount of evidence revealed.

CAO’s UltraLite™ ALS forensic light system, an industry standard and leading brand of forensic lights, now incorporates advanced Turbo light technology in six of the interchangeable heads used for various detection methods. The Turbo technology enhances detection of trace evidence, body fluids, fingerprints, blood spatter, gunshot residues and explosive accelerants. Additionally, the Turbo technology helps to reveal subcutaneous bruising, injuries and wounds on both living and dead bodies and assists in the location of evidence containing DNA.

“Our new UltraLite ALS Turbo forensic technology offers higher detection capabilities and represents the culmination of nearly a decade of forensic research and design,” said Dr. Densen Cao, CEO and founder of CAO. “Our scientists and developers have worked closely with forensics experts who have combined experience of more than 50 years to ensure we deliver the best system for efficient processing of crime scenes and evidence.”

The UltraLite ALS system’s main head, called the BMT™ Turbo head, is a universal evidence and crime scene processing light. The BMT Turbo head offers a wavelength spectrum that now shows more than 99.5 percent of detectable evidence, resulting in more efficient processing of crime scenes. The BMT Turbo head also produces more blue wavelength output power than any other semiconductor-based ALS.

With the launch of its advanced Turbo technology, CAO is also introducing its newest specialized infrared head, which enables precise detection of altered documents and trace evidence.

For more information, visit www.Ultralite-ALS.com.


Download the full report here

 
Next >






Forensic Podiatry (Part Two of Two)

THE DISCIPLINE of forensic podiatry—or, in other words, the examination of pedal evidence—has progressed significantly over the past ten years. It is no longer a question of “What can you do with a footprint?” but rather, “Who can we use to evaluate the footprint?” Cases involving pedal evidence, especially bloody footprints and issues of determining shoe sizing or fit issues compared to questioned footwear, have become more common over the past two or three years.

Read more...