Can Departments Benefit from Mobile ID Fingerprint Devices?

The NIJ-funded Forensic Science Technology Center of Excellence has released the following report: Landscape Study of Mobile ID Fingerprint Devices.

This report provides a “landscape” view of the issues and products associated with mobile devices for fingerprint identification, with a focus on forensic applications. The document is intended to furnish laboratory managers and investigators with a survey of current commercially available products. In addition, the report provides decision makers and potential end users with examples that

  • illustrate successful adoption;
  • issues to consider related to implementation of mobile ID devices;
  • and a snapshot of current mobile ID technologies.

Upon review, the reader may better understand whether mobile ID devices can benefit his or her organization and how to proceed with selecting a platform and implementing use.

This report is a product of an NIJ-funded project but is not published by the Department of Justice.

Read the full report here.

< Prev   Next >

Court Case Update

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE went through a nearly three-year ordeal in the New Hampshire court system, but eventually emerged unscathed. On April 4, 2008, the New Hampshire Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision of a lower court to exclude expert testimony regarding fingerprint evidence in the case of The State of New Hampshire v. Richard Langill. The case has been remanded back to the Rockingham County Superior Court.