A New Way to Store Property and Evidence
Written by McKenna Ruzga   

Get more capacity within your budget and current space

Maintaining a secure chain of custody is key to maintaining the integrity of cases in your community – and the key to maintaining your chain of custody is an organized, well-thought-out evidence storage system. But if your evidence room is already overflowing and funding for a new facility is years away, it can feel impossible to keep your property and evidence room compliant with best practices.

How it Works

By suspending shelves on an overhead track, the aisles of the LEVPRO system compact to greatly increase the capacity of your property and evidence storage. Unlike compact storage you may have seen before, LEVPRO shelving doesn’t require floor rails – which means it installs with minimal disruption using just a few tools, doesn’t require modifications to the floors, walls, or ceiling, and can be relocated if a new facility becomes a reality.

LEVPRO is installed directly under pallet racking to give you additional overhead space. We can also provide other solutions like evidence deposit lockers to give your facility a fully secured chain of custody. With a variety of accessories like dividers and bins, each box, bag, and item can be easily organized and retrieved when needed.

This system allows you to:

• Keep evidence and property organized
• Retrieve items quickly
• Configure the system based on the items you’re storing
• Clean under the system easily
• Access multiple aisles at the same time
• Gain significant storage capacity over traditional shelving
• Turn wasted space into productive storage areas

To learn more about how LEVPRO can help you optimize the way you use your property and evidence room or shop our most popular configurations online, visit www.spacesaver.com/levpro.

Note: ETM Insights is a sponsored section of EvidenceMagazine.com

 

 
< Prev   Next >






Court Case Update

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE went through a nearly three-year ordeal in the New Hampshire court system, but eventually emerged unscathed. On April 4, 2008, the New Hampshire Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision of a lower court to exclude expert testimony regarding fingerprint evidence in the case of The State of New Hampshire v. Richard Langill. The case has been remanded back to the Rockingham County Superior Court.

Read more...