Remote Access to Digital Evidence

So many investigations today involve digital evidence — and it grows increasingly likely all the time that this digital evidence is held at a remote location, possibly even by a company overseas. A report recently published by the RAND Corporation (made possible by an NIJ grant) seeks "to improve legitimate law enforcement access and use of remotely held digital evidence in a manner that is legal, effective, timely, and understandable."


With information driven largely by a panel of experts on the topic, the report explains the need for law enforcement and service providers to establish an efficient means for information sharing.

Recommendations include:

  • Create a way for investigators to access specialists and training for working with providers of data
  • Provide standards for data requests served to providers
  • Research methodologies for collecting digital evidence
  • Improve communication between law enforcement and service provider

You can read the report and full recommendations here.

< Prev

Court Case Update

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE went through a nearly three-year ordeal in the New Hampshire court system, but eventually emerged unscathed. On April 4, 2008, the New Hampshire Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision of a lower court to exclude expert testimony regarding fingerprint evidence in the case of The State of New Hampshire v. Richard Langill. The case has been remanded back to the Rockingham County Superior Court.