Editorial

Miss the photos and figures?
View, read, share, save, and print this article
as it appeared in the print edition now, online!

THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGY is all about sidestepping common problems and making a job easier and the results better. In this issue, our cover story (on Page 16) focuses on such a scenario: Those working in computer forensics are aware of a relatively new technology that allows an entire operating system to run on a CD or DVD. But because these so-called “live CDs” do not store data on the computer’s hard drive, they leave behind no trace of information for examiners to recover. The article offers a practical solution to that problem, along with useful and in-depth background information that explains how live CDs work. It is an example of technology working to overcome problems created by technology.

Technology, however, is not always the answer to everyday problems. Sometimes the answer lies in communication. In this issue’s Friction Ridge column (on Page 8), John Black provides a few analogies that will help jurors and judges better understand what fingerprint examiners mean when they refer to “sufficiency”. The analogies are simple and straightforward. It proves that sometimes you just need to step back, take a look at a challenge from a different perspective, and work to use the right language to help others get a firm grasp on your area of expertise.

The Association for Crime Scene Reconstruction (ACSR) is engaged in similar work with its new Crime Scene Reconstruction Standardization Committee and Shooting Reconstruction Standardization Committee. The goal of these groups is to draft glossaries of terms commonly used in those fields. In the ACSR profile (on Page 4), the organization states: “This is the first comprehensive effort to standardize terminology in these disciplines and will provide a valuable resource to all crime scene and shooting reconstruction practitioners.” The effort will help make communication easier between practitioners, jurors, and judges—and will address the continued push for standards in the forensic science disciplines.

Even as technology changes and proliferates (see the Tool Kit on Page 6 and the article on close-range photogrammetry on Page 10 for examples of evolving crime scene reconstruction technology), the next few years will continue the trend of a back-to-basics approach to forensic science. Latent print examiners will take a closer look at the way they communicate with jurors, professional organizations will establish more standards and certification programs for practitioners, and the field as a whole will work to define seemingly simple terms such as “laboratory” and “scientist”. These are trends that are on our editorial radar, and we look forward to bringing you those stories—along with the latest inventions, techniques, and tools—in 2012.

Happy Holidays, and best of luck in the New Year,
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , editor
Evidence Technology Magazine

 
< Prev   Next >






Interview with an Expert

One of the more specialized areas of crime-scene investigation has to do with searching for evidence of arson. To get some background in this area, we spoke with an individual who has had more than 46 years in fire service, 24 of which have focused specifically on fire/arson investigation.

Read more...