Evidence found that may solve 1985 case

Topeka police have located further evidence that may help solve a decades-old rape case.


Detective Adam Arensdorf with the Topeka Police Department’s Special Victim’s Unit said the Kansas Bureau of Investigation located in its evidence archives the original sexual assault kit and clothing collected after a 1985 unsolved rape in downtown Topeka.

The evidence includes some of the DNA that eventually freed Topeka man Joe Jones of the crime. Jones was exonerated in 1992 after DNA testing excluded him as the rapist, but no one else was ever arrested for the crime.

The case was reopened after a Lawrence Journal-World investigation revealed that the original scientist who tested the DNA still had some DNA material, stored in a cooler in California since 1992.

Arensdorf said the KBI will now evaluate the evidence it has to see if it’s still testable. If it’s not, he said, they’ll proceed with efforts to obtain the DNA evidence stored by the original DNA-testing firm.

If testing can produce a DNA profile, that information will be entered into the national DNA database, known as CODIS. When Jones was exonerated in 1992, such a database did not exist. The national database would then compare the DNA profile to offenders across the country. If a match were found, police will issue a search warrant to perform confirmation testing, Arensdorf said.

Police have also been in contact with the victim in the case, who now lives out of state, and she is willing to cooperate with the investigation, Arensdorf said.

The statute of limitations on prosecution of rape cases in Kansas is five years, but Kansas law also allows prosecution of rape cases for up to one year after DNA evidence has identified a suspect.

Written by Shaun Hittle, LJWorld.com
Link to Article

< Prev   Next >

Court Case Update

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE went through a nearly three-year ordeal in the New Hampshire court system, but eventually emerged unscathed. On April 4, 2008, the New Hampshire Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision of a lower court to exclude expert testimony regarding fingerprint evidence in the case of The State of New Hampshire v. Richard Langill. The case has been remanded back to the Rockingham County Superior Court.